The FRQ narrative CV (CV-FRQ): how to prepare it

What the Fonds de recherche du Québec asks for in its CV descriptif: three sections, six pages in French or five in English, up to ten contributions with an audience and an impact for each. And how to write one from the research record you already have.

Since its 2025-2026 competitions the Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ) has asked applicants for a narrative CV, called the CV descriptif or CV-FRQ, in place of the Canadian Common CV. The document is short. It has three fixed sections, and the committee reads it for what you say a piece of work changed rather than for how much you list. This guide goes through the FRQ instructions section by section, links the official documents, and then explains how to write the CV from the record you already have.

What the CV-FRQ is

The FRQ presents the CV-FRQ as a way to show your expertise and relevant skills through a broad range of contributions, not only publications. You write it in the FRQ Word template and attach it as a PDF to the FRQnet application form. The form itself collects your education, employment history, languages and current position, so the CV does not repeat them. The three sections always come in this order:

The rules

Official documents

Section 1: background and skills

Put here the expertise or experience that shows you can carry out the project, the activities that show leadership, earlier collaborations or results on the research theme, the concrete effects of your past work, prizes and scholarships, and skills you acquired through personal experience. Write it for the programme in front of you. The evaluator reads this section against the call's criteria, so use their order and their vocabulary.

Section 2: up to ten contributions

This section carries the document. A contribution need not be one publication. It can be a set of closely related outputs, for example a paper, the dataset behind it and the guideline that used it. The FRQ list of what counts is long: publications of every kind, knowledge mobilisation such as media work, podcasts and public lectures, review and assessment work, community service, artistic creation, data infrastructure and cohorts, intellectual property, conference organisation, partnerships, memoranda that shaped a policy or a standard of practice, software and tools, and open science in the UNESCO sense. For each contribution give:

For publications the FRQ asks for APA style or another standard recognised in your discipline. Put your own name in bold, and the names of the co-investigators on the application. Add an asterisk after the name of every person you supervised (Nom, Prénom*), from undergraduates to postdoctoral researchers and highly qualified personnel. Do not repeat here what you said in the first section.

Section 3: supervision and mentorship

Describe how you have trained the next generation: supervision of college and university students at every level, of postdoctoral researchers and of highly qualified personnel; teaching and training workshops; formal or informal mentorship of early-career researchers, colleagues and partners; outreach that brings students into research; training in methods or knowledge systems, Indigenous knowledge included; and work on safe, equitable and inclusive research environments. A career outside academia counts as much as one inside it.

Showing impact without inflating it

Applicants new to narrative CVs ask how to prove that a contribution mattered, and evaluators new to the format ask the same thing. A narrative claim is checked by something the reader can follow, not by a number. Take the sentence "this paper documented the signal that led the regulator to amend the product monograph in 2023". A reader can verify it if the paper has a DOI, the monograph has a date and the regulator's decision is public. A citation count or an h-index says nothing about that chain, and the FRQ instructions never ask for one.

So write the chain: the output, what it changed, and where that change is recorded, with the identifiers. Where a contribution reached practitioners or the public (audiences B and C), say through what: a clinical guideline, a ministry report, a training programme, a series of interviews. Where you cannot document an effect, describe the significance of the work and your role in it, and stop there. An evaluator can tell a documented effect from a claimed one.

Preparing it with SigmaCV

SigmaCV builds your full academic CV from open research data (ORCID, OpenAlex, Crossref, DataCite and others) and lets you apply funder layouts to it, reversibly. Two of those layouts are the CV-FRQ in French and in English. Each shows the three FRQ sections under the FRQ's own headings and hides everything else, since the FRQnet form collects the rest. You write prose in each section, and a claim can point at an entry of your record through an evidence link, so the reader lands on the DOI.

  1. Sign in with ORCID and let the record build. Mark what is not yours and add missing works by DOI.
  2. Apply the CV-FRQ layout, French or English, from the CV model picker. The previous layout is saved as a preset.
  3. Write the three sections. Under each one the evidence panel lists your publications, datasets, supervision records and other outputs you can cite with an evidence link. Keep an eye on the character count and the page count against the six or five page limit.
  4. Export to DOCX, paste the sections into the FRQ Word template, check the presentation rules, and attach the PDF in FRQnet.

Build your CV from your ORCID record, free

Frequently asked questions

Does the CV-FRQ replace the Canadian Common CV for FRQ competitions?

For the programmes that have adopted it, yes. The FRQ asks for the CV-FRQ as a PDF attachment in FRQnet. Adoption has gone programme by programme, so check the rules of the programme you are applying to.

Is the CV-FRQ the same as the federal Tri-agency CV?

No. The two documents have the same spirit, a narrative with a small number of significant contributions and a section on mentorship, but the Tri-agency CV belongs to CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC. It has its own template and its own timetable: NSERC's 2027 competitions, and CIHR's Project Grant no sooner than fall 2027. Prepare each one for the funder that asks for it.

Should I include citation counts or my h-index?

The FRQ instructions do not ask for them, and they do not show what the CV-FRQ is judged on, which is the impact, significance and value of a contribution and your role in it. Document the effect a contribution had instead, with identifiers a reader can follow.

Can a contribution be something other than a publication?

Yes. The FRQ list is broad on purpose. Knowledge mobilisation, policy memoranda, data infrastructure, software, artistic creation, partnerships, conference organisation, intellectual property, community service and open science all count, on their own or grouped with related outputs.

Now see the CV the public record builds for you — no account needed

Your name as on your papers, or your ORCID iD — no account needed.

All guides